Blog
7 min read
How often should consultants fill in timesheets? Record time as you work and check it before the end of each day. Submit the completed week by Friday, then approve it on Monday.
That is a practical default, not a rule for every consultancy. Set the schedule from the next decision that uses the data. Daily staffing needs fresher entries than a monthly estimate review. Billing needs approved entries, but a project lead needs an early warning before approval.
The aim is not perfect employee compliance. It is data that is fresh enough for a commercial decision.
A timesheet is useful only when it answers a question in time to change the answer.
Suppose a consultant records Monday's work on Friday. The hours might reach the invoice before billing closes. Too late. A project lead decides on Wednesday whether to move work between people.
The same entry has passed one timing test and failed another.
First, list the decisions that depend on time data. Consultancies usually need it for staffing and project cost. They also need it for margin, billing and future estimates. Parakeeto recommends that you define the questions first. You can then choose the structure and tracking method that answers them. It also warns against using time data to police arbitrary targets (Parakeeto's time tracking framework).
This changes the management conversation. Do not ask, “Did everyone submit?” Ask, “Is the record current enough for tomorrow's staffing decision?”
Freshness is the time between doing work and recording it against the correct project and work item. A correction window is the period when someone can fix an entry before a decision uses it.
Use this policy as a starting point:
| Decision | Required entry timing | Owner | Correction window |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily staffing and workload | Record on each work switch; check by end of day | Consultant, checked by project lead | Before the next working day's staffing check |
| Weekly project cost and margin | Complete daily; submit by Friday close | Project lead | Monday morning before the margin review |
| Client billing | Submit by the weekly cut-off; approve before the billing run | Project lead or billing owner | Before invoice preparation starts |
| Future project estimate | Use only closed and reviewed project records | Estimating owner | During project close, before data enters the reference set |
Each deadline supports the next one: the daily check supplies the weekly review, and the weekly review supplies billing. At project close, reviewed delivery data becomes evidence for estimates.
Do not make every correction window longer because billing happens monthly. A monthly invoice cycle does not make month-old staffing data useful.
Keep the policy to one page. Name the cut-off, owner, correction path, and affected decision. A long handbook will not make unclear project codes easier to use.
Record an entry when the work changes, not after every small action. A useful entry needs the client and project. Add the work item, duration and billable status.
For a consultant moving between workshops and calls, with analysis between them, the routine can be simple:
Capture now. MinuteDock recommends that you capture time during the work and fix missed time on the same day. It says the detail should match the billing model. Apply rounding at invoicing rather than during capture (MinuteDock's time tracking practices).
Keep the entry categories small enough to choose quickly. They must still map to a decision. “Project work” is too broad if you estimate discovery and implementation separately. A list of dozens of internal tasks is too detailed if nobody reviews them.
For fixed-fee work, connect the entry to the work you priced and use the same principle to track costs against a fixed-price statement of work. Hours against a project total show that cost moved. Hours against a deliverable show where it moved.
Daily capture keeps the data fresh; weekly submission makes it complete and ready for review.
Treat Friday as a reconciliation point: the consultant checks the week for missing days, duplicate entries, wrong projects, and unclear descriptions. The project lead then reviews exceptions on Monday.
Friday must not become reconstruction day. The Agency Works describes how people use calendars and sent emails to rebuild a missing week. It argues that fresher timesheets better support estimating and planning. They also support profit and staffing (The Agency Works).
The distinction matters:
One weekly reminder addresses only submission, so it does not fix late capture or delayed approval.
Use Monday's weekly project margin review as the hard edge. If corrections remain open after that meeting, mark the affected project data as provisional. Do not discuss a margin number as settled while known time is missing.
Corrections are normal, but hidden corrections are not.
Give people a short route to correct mistakes, so a consultant can change an open entry directly. After approval, require a reason and let the project or billing owner reopen it. Keep the original period visible so the team knows which report to refresh.
Different mistakes need different action:
| Problem | Immediate action | Commercial effect to check |
|---|---|---|
| Time is missing | Add it and label an estimate if duration is uncertain | Project cost, remaining budget, and billing |
| Wrong project | Move the entry | Both projects' cost and margin |
| Wrong work item | Reclassify it | Deliverable variance and future estimate |
| Wrong billable status | Correct it before billing | Invoice support and recoverable value |
| Entry arrives after project close | Reopen the close review | Final cost and estimating reference |
Do not silently force a late entry into the current week; keep the date on which the work happened. Otherwise, weekly trends become neat but false.
If a correction changes a fixed-fee project's hours, recalculate its effective hourly rate. If it changes direct delivery cost, refresh the margin view too.
The daily default can change when the decision window changes.
Use tighter capture for short tasks across many clients. Each switch creates another fact that can be forgotten or put against the wrong job. Time Champ's consultant templates also separate daily and weekly formats from monthly formats by reporting need. Its guidance tells consultants to log each task when it finishes rather than rebuild the week later (Time Champ).
Long, focused work can use fewer entries because a consultant who spends a day on one analysis does not need artificial fragments. The end-of-day check still confirms both the work item and the billable status.
Use a tighter approval cut-off before billing. Timing matters. An entry can still be unsuitable for an invoice because its project, description, or billable status is wrong.
Use a separate close review before the data informs another quote. Compare estimated and actual hours at the same work-item level. Record the reason. A bare total cannot tell the next estimator whether discovery, workshops, analysis, or revision caused the variance.
That link to the next quote is the point. Match outputs. When you price a paid discovery phase, prior time is useful only if it maps to similar work. Fresh data protects the live project; reviewed data improves the next estimate.
Start with one team and one decision cycle; do not launch a large compliance campaign.
First, choose the Monday margin review and work backwards from its start time. Set approval before the meeting, submission before approval, and a daily capture check for each consultant.
Next, remove friction and give people only the projects and work items they need; explain how each field affects staffing, project cost, billing, or estimating. Xergy makes the same operational connection between current entries, work packages, project budgets, and approvals (Xergy's timesheet guidance).
Review exceptions for four weeks. Look for unclear codes and missing project assignments, then check late approvals and repeated corrections. Fix the process before you add more reminders.
The practical default stays simple: capture during work, check daily, submit Friday, approve Monday, and review again at project close. Change a deadline only when a named business decision needs fresher or slower data.
Korrel lets you log time against priced work and shows tracked delivery cost against the project budget. Start your free trial and give each project review a current cost record.
RELATED READING:
Quotes go over budget because they were priced from memory. The fix is a diagnostic: ten finished jobs, quoted against actual, and the pattern that survives all ten.
Practices bill by RIBA stage and record time against nothing smaller than the job. Here is how to book hours per stage so the next fee is priced from evidence.
Design the boundary of each stage before work starts. Define its output, included review, dependencies, and trigger for reopening the fee.
Korrel turns briefs into structured proposals, then tracks what each job actually costs.
START FREE TRIAL